<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Andrew Ringler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewringler.com/wp</link>
	<description>me, film, security, technology and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vitamin C Still Doesn&#8217;t Prevent Cancer by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/2008/09/06/vitamin-c-still-doesnt-prevent-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/?p=93#comment-161</guid>
		<description>It is given that any medical advances made in cancer prevention and cure are a huge benefit to humanity.

The word &quot;happy&quot; in the phrase: &quot;If you haven’t been wasting your money overdosing on vitamin-c supplements you might be happy to know that vitamin C still doesn’t cure cancer&quot; is meant to offer humor at the potential for a meager conciliation prize.  Obviously the outcome that would make anyone the &quot;happiest&quot; would be for Vitamin C to be a cure for cancer, but it is not unfortunately.

The only consolation is the fact that some people are several hundred dollars richer than they would have been if they had spent their money on superfluous supplements.

Another parallel for this type of humor follows.  Imagine a newspaper cartoon picturing two men standing on the side of the road.  They are staring a wrecked car on fire.  The one man says to the other: &quot;You&#039;ll certainly save money on gas now&quot;.

Could you please provide a reference to the quote you have attributed to Plato?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is given that any medical advances made in cancer prevention and cure are a huge benefit to humanity.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;happy&#8221; in the phrase: &#8220;If you haven’t been wasting your money overdosing on vitamin-c supplements you might be happy to know that vitamin C still doesn’t cure cancer&#8221; is meant to offer humor at the potential for a meager conciliation prize.  Obviously the outcome that would make anyone the &#8220;happiest&#8221; would be for Vitamin C to be a cure for cancer, but it is not unfortunately.</p>
<p>The only consolation is the fact that some people are several hundred dollars richer than they would have been if they had spent their money on superfluous supplements.</p>
<p>Another parallel for this type of humor follows.  Imagine a newspaper cartoon picturing two men standing on the side of the road.  They are staring a wrecked car on fire.  The one man says to the other: &#8220;You&#8217;ll certainly save money on gas now&#8221;.</p>
<p>Could you please provide a reference to the quote you have attributed to Plato?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vitamin C Still Doesn&#8217;t Prevent Cancer by Dardar</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/2008/09/06/vitamin-c-still-doesnt-prevent-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Dardar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/?p=93#comment-160</guid>
		<description>&quot;...you might be happy to know that vitamin C still doesn’t cure cancer.&quot;

&quot;Happy&quot;? You&#039;ve got issues here.

&quot;The poverty, and danger, of reductionist science.&quot;
- Plato</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;you might be happy to know that vitamin C still doesn’t cure cancer.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Happy&#8221;? You&#8217;ve got issues here.</p>
<p>&#8220;The poverty, and danger, of reductionist science.&#8221;<br />
- Plato</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Juno (2007) by sara ringler</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/2008/02/19/juno-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>sara ringler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewringler.com/wp/?p=34#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I agree...........I loved Juno..........everything about it was really new and fresh......
Ellen Page was natural, I think she must be like that in real life.

anyway........nice site, good writing Andrew.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..I loved Juno&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.everything about it was really new and fresh&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Ellen Page was natural, I think she must be like that in real life.</p>
<p>anyway&#8230;&#8230;..nice site, good writing Andrew&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.145 seconds -->
